Credit: Lillian Mongeau for EdSource

Second graders Jayden Lew and Giselle Ortega work on their Spanish grammar at Edison Elementary Schoolhouse in Glendale, where they are enrolled in a dual language immersion plan.

Credit: Lillian Mongeau for EdSource

2d graders Jayden Lew and Giselle Ortega piece of work on their Spanish grammer at Edison Elementary School in Glendale, where they are enrolled in a dual linguistic communication immersion program.

Researchers studying a group of California schoolhouse districts are highly critical of the state's system for providing services to English learners in a report released this week.

Citing disparities in results and strategies among districts, professors from Stanford and other universities called for creating common, statewide criteria for determining who English language learners are and for determining when they no longer need extra help. They also recommend:

  • Stronger monitoring to ensure that English learners have access to core bookish classes and demanding content, the lack of which contributes to a lower graduation charge per unit and readiness for college.
  • Better preparing new teachers and training existing teachers to understand second linguistic communication acquisition and how to contain language instruction in all content areas.
  • Catastrophe the full general ban on bilingual pedagogy and creating incentives for districts to expand bilingual and dual language immersion programs, which researchers said can be more effective than English-only education in educational activity English fluency. An initiative to rescind Proposition 227, the 1998 general ban on bilingual teaching, will be on the ballot in 2016.

The study incorporates findings of three school district–academy research partnerships: in Los Angeles Unified, in a collaboration of vii small and medium-sized districts known equally the English language Linguistic communication Learner Leadership Network, and in an unnamed large urban district working with Stanford'south Heart for Education Policy Analysis. The written report was published by Policy Analysis for California Education, or PACE, an education research and policy arrangement. Ilana Umansky, an assistant professor in the College of Education at the University of Oregon, was the lead researcher. Several professors at the Stanford Academy Graduate School of Education, including Sean Reardon and Kenji Hakuta, were co-authors.

One cardinal finding was the charge per unit at which English language learners were identified every bit learning disabled. In half dozen of the vii districts in the English language learner network, long-term English learners – those receiving language services for half-dozen or more years – were also classified in need of special educational activity at two to four times the rate as not-English learners. In Napa Unified, 40 percent of long-term English learners were co-labeled special educational activity students. This may indicate that the districts tin't distinguish betwixt English language learners with academic needs and those with learning disabilities, the written report said.

Almost 23 percent of California's students are English learners, the largest number of any land in the nation. By almost bookish measures – including graduation rates, dropout rates and higher attendance – they lag other students in the state. In the initial results of the Smarter Counterbalanced standardized tests in the Common Core standards, only 11 pct of English learners were designated every bit meeting requirements in math and English language language arts – far below the state boilerplate.

Just the researchers noted that the transition to new bookish standards and additional funding for English learners through the Local Control Funding Formula present opportunities for improving education for the state's 1.4 million English learners, including longer school days for some students.

There volition as well be a new English language proficiency assessment, the English Proficiency Assessments for California, or ELPAC, aligned to the Common Core. Replacing the current California English Language Evolution Test, or CELDT, it will be used to make up one's mind when English learners can be reclassified as fluent in English and no longer needing language assistance. The report says it's critical to set the proficiency score at a level that ensures students will be able to handle academic cadre content. This was not e'er the case with the CELDT, it said.

The ELPAC should be used equally the sole measure for redesignation statewide, the researchers said. Districts have used boosted measures, such every bit grades and proficiency scores on other state tests, in which the scores held back some students no longer needing sheltered English teaching in classes with less demanding content. At that place also has been besides much discretion in determining reclassification, the report said, and a tendency in some districts to prematurely redesignate middle and high school students.

The written report also said that the initial English learner classification is overly broad and does non reverberate abode conditions, family education and wealth, which are predictive of how speedily an English learner will likely become proficient. The nomenclature rates vary significantly among districts, the study said. It also noted "troubling accomplishment gaps among English learners of different linguistic and national origins," with 90 percentage English learners of Chinese origin in ane district reclassified by middle school, compared to 65 percent of Hispanic English language learners.

Citing the need to aggrandize access to core academic instruction, bilingual instruction and meliorate prepared teachers, the study concluded, "Changes forth these lines would not necessarily require large new investments, but they could yield substantial benefits for big numbers of California students."

To get more reports like this ane, click hither to sign upwardly for EdSource's no-cost daily e-mail on latest developments in education.